We use cookies to personalize content and advertisements, to offer social media functions and to analyze access to our website.
You can revoke the given consent at any time. You can find further information in our Privacy Policy.
May 2011
On 16, May 2011 | In News @en | By KuL-Blog
The RoHS Recast is expected to be published in the Official Journal of the European Union in June.
Besides the new product categories and new obligations for documentation and labeling, also elementary definitions will change. There will be changes with an impact on the decision whether or not a product will be in the scope of RoHS. These changes will mainly be in the definitions of EEE, fixed installation and large scale stationary industry tools.
For companies not affected by RoHS I, these changes will mean an imperative check of these definitions with regard to their products. Such an assessment evaluates the definitions and the requirements for the manufacturer, importer or distributor of electronic and electrical equipment. As the member states will have to transpose the recast RoHS directive into national law within 18 months after the publication, companies should use the time and already start analyzing their situation and duties right after the publication in the Official Journal.
Apr 2011
On 28, Apr 2011 | In News @en | By KuL-Blog
The 2-day event on REACH and CLP brought together REACH responsible persons from industrial companies, REACH experts, and representatives from national authorities. Reviews showed the development and the lessons learnt within the first registration period.
Although more or less all of the obligated companies had successfully passed the first registration period and met the deadlines for CLP notification and the new safety data sheets, there is no time for relaxing at all in sight.
The forum discussed several general topics like e.g. changes and improvements in REACH-IT and IUCLID and shared experiences from the first registration period, gathered in different industry branches with different rules (registrant, importer, distributor, downstream user) and presented their specific challenges in complying with REACH.
Specific topics like e.g. the handling of polymers or neighboring legislation offered some insight into the wide range of REACH- or other chemistry-related issues.
The Chemicals Forum Europe seems to be the right platform for sharing experiences with the handling of the REACH and CLP regulations. It shows variety, depth, and challenges companies have to face, and helps finding solutions for compliance.
Apr 2011
On 19, Apr 2011 | In News @en | By KuL-Blog
Beginning with 2011, companies have to notify substances manufactured in or imported into the EU, either as such or in a preparation, to the Classification & Labelling Inventory.
June 1, 2011, another notification obligation for manufacturers and importers of articles becomes effective. Producers and importers have to notify substances of very high concern (SVHC) in articles.
Who has to notify and what is the information to be submitted?
The criteria for the notification are:
• the article contains a SVHC substance >0,1 % mass.
• the total tonnage per year and producer / importer
of the svhc substance is > 1t
• the producer or importer cannot exclude exposure
to humans or the environment during normal or reasonably
foreseeable conditions of use (including disposal)
• the substance has not been registered for that use
Which information has to be submitted?
Besides the identity and contact details of the producer or importer, the registration number (if available) and various information about the substance identity and classification have to be provided. In addition, also information about uses and tonnage bands has to be submitted to the agency.
Producers and importers of articles, who do not deal with substances in their daily business, will discover difficulties by gathering and providing this specific information.
Find out if your article is affected and start gathering information in time. After the extension of the candidate list, companies will have a six months period for the notification of SVHCs in their articles.
Apr 2011
On 05, Apr 2011 | In News @en | By KuL-Blog
April 1, 2011, the European Chemicals Agency has released the second version of the “guidance on requirements for substances in articles”.
Companies manufacturing, importing or dealing with articles should follow the interpretations of this guidance document. Although they are not legally binding, the guidance documents are used by national authorities and serve as consultation sources in court proceedings.
An important change within the guidance document may, in a worst case, lead to new obligations for those producers or importers of products that are not longer seen as articles but as substances.
Suddenly, those companies may find themselves under the obligation to register. In such a case it might well be that they have not done a pre-registration or have even missed a deadline already.
Check now, whether your product is, in the light of the new guidance document, rather viewed as an article or as a substance or preparation, and re-assess your obligations under REACH.
Mar 2011
On 29, Mar 2011 | In News @en | By KuL-Blog
The REACH-EN-FORCE II project starting summer 2011 will focus on the obligations of downstream users in REACH, and inspectors have attended special trainings.
But what are the exact obligations a downstream user has to fulfill and what are the timelines?
Many of them are not sure about their duties but also about their rights. Some companies have not informed their suppliers about their identified uses of substances that may have been registered meanwhile. They are now running the risk of not having their uses considered in the exposure scenarios of the Chemical Safety Reports and the Extended Safety Data Sheets.
These companies now need a solution or a proof for compliance with the requirements of art. 37 REACH.
Safety Data Sheets also will be a topic inspectors focus on. As industry had experienced difficulties with the implementation of the new format in time, CEFIC asked ECHA for more patience and a grace period. Nevertheless, the enforcement is carried out by national authorities who may strictly stick to the statutory provisions and timelines.
Mar 2011
On 18, Mar 2011 | In News @en | By KuL-Blog
Do you know if your company is concerned by REACH? Many companies that are not primarily affected by the regulation because they do not produce or deal with substances or preparations nevertheless do have obligations under the REACH and CLP regulations. Companies using substances or preparations, so called Downstream Users, or dealing with articles also have to fulfill obligations in order to be compliant with REACH.
Mar 2011
On 10, Mar 2011 | In News @en | By KuL-Blog
The RoHS Recast is just about to be finally approved. During the legislative process, industry had favored the alternative to include this substance-related directive within the REACH regulation. The Europeean legislation did not move into this direction.
The draft directive now rather looks like a Mini-REACH. Why?
Looking at the new rules of the RoHS recast and at the alternatively available arrangements of the authorization and restriction processes of REACH, the result is the following comparison:
Same or similar rules in RoHS recast and REACH
1. Personal Scope: Manufacturers and importers
2. Objective Scope: The Reach Regulation with respect to articles also
includes all electrical and electronic products
3. Ban of substances: is controlled by authorization or
restriction under REACH
4. Exemptions (products and restriction of substances):
can be integrated in the REACH regulation.
5. Criteria for decision for exemptions, new banned substances,
authorization and restrictions: by far the same
Different rules in RoHS recast and REACH
1. The RoHS directive has a protective purpose:
Recycling worker’s health and environmental aspects of handling
and recycling
2. The ban of substance of the RoHS directive leads to a general,
product-related ban of sales, even for products from outside the EU.
REACH regulates only information duties within
the supply chain (art. 33). Restrictions can also define that products
containing certain hazardous substances are not allowed
to be placed on the market.
For these items only, separate rules would have been necessary
to be included in the from the RoHS directive.
Do these differences justify a separate directive like RoHS additionally to the REACH regulation? Rather not! A reduction of the amount of legislation and a harmonization of procedures without changes in the objectives and in the interest of the industries concerned would have been possible. Too bad…
Feb 2011
On 25, Feb 2011 | In News @en | By KuL-Blog
K&L is a regular participant at the REACH workshops conducted by BDI (Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie) in Berlin. The recent event took place February 23. Topics on the agenda centered round industry’s difficulties in implementing the REACH regulation.
The participants discussed legal consequences of ECHA’s changed guidelines. Currently, the guideline on how to handle substances in articles is undergoing a review and will result in new or modified obligations for industry. Manufacturers with so far no registration duty will be abruptly confronted with the obligation to register.
The obligations for companies to notify substances in articles according to art. 7 (3) will discover difficulties in gathering all information required. For importers of an article with notification obligation of svhc (substance of very high concern) it will be hardly possible to have information available about e.g. optical activity or purity of the substance.
K&L attends such workshops in order to gather detailed information about the industry’s requirements and opinion of the REACH and CLP regulation. We are close to our customers and their needs and customize our consulting services accordingly. For the upcoming workshops, K&L will participate with a presentation, sharing our knowledge and experience.
Feb 2011
On 18, Feb 2011 | In News @en | By KuL-Blog
The following 6 substances of very high concern (svhc) have been put into Annex XIV of the REACH regulation yesterday, and for further sales or use are from now on subject to authorization.
• 5-tert-butyl-2,4,6-trinitro-m-xylene (musk xylene)
• 4,4`-diaminodiphenylmethane – MDA
• hexabromocyclododecane – HBCDD
• bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate – DEHP
• benzylbutylphthalate – BBP
• dibutylphthalate – DBP
After the so called “Sunset Date” as a grace period in 2014 and 2015, those substances are not allowed to be placed on the marked or used unless companies have successfully passed the authorization process.
For an authorization, companies have to prove taking security measures that are necessary for an appropriate control of risks, or state that the benefit for the economy and the society prevails.
If there are existing substitutes or technical procedures as a feasible alternative, schedules for the conversion have to be presented.
Substances that are put on Annex XIV remain part of the candidate list and subject to the information requirements for substances in articles.
Feb 2011
On 18, Feb 2011 | In News @en | By KuL-Blog
Within the REACH schedule, many SMEs are expected for the 2013 registration period. For those companies, K&L offers a special registration service package.
In general, SMEs do not necessarily have the expertise, capacity, required data and studies for an individual registration. In order to effectively fulfill their registration obligations, they need a quick, secure and cost-saving registration path by e.g. joining a Lead registration.
The K&L Joint registration package for SMEs comprises
– an introductory presentation on REACH and
– the evaluation of obligations in a first meeting
– communication with the Lead registrant and the authorities
– generation of the Technical Dossier
– generation of the Chemical safety Report
– final submission of the registration
Additional services, if required and necessary are offered in line with the services. Further service packages e.g. for substances in articles are available, too.
This service is suitable for companies with no or a few data and studies that need to register as a joint registrant and are looking for a quick and cost-effective solution for their registration obligations.